Why specifying the right type of glass isn’t always clear.
 |
| St. Mary’s Hospital in Michigan also features SunGuard SN 68 insulated glass from Guardian and fabricator Oldcastle. The glass has a blue exterior appearance and maximizes energy efficiency while still allowing in natural light. (Photo courtesy of Guardian Industries)
|
|
Consider the Elevation
It is common for architects to specify the same type of glass for an entire building, regardless of the elevation or orientation. However, the different sides of a building can have very different energy requirements. Without the proper glass, it’s common for occupants in the western and southern exposures of a building to complain of discomfort during certain times of the year and certain times of the day. In fact, occupants will even report that the window glass is warm to the touch on the western and southern sections of the building. With today’s high-performance glass, architects can mix and match products for maximum energy savings and complementary aesthetics. For example,
an architect may specify glass that lets in more heat on the north side but blocks solar heat and glare on the south and west sides.
It Pays to Be Creative
By being more flexible and creative when specifying glass, architects can also have more impact in controlling energy efficiencies. To achieve maximum energy savings, it’s important for architects to understand that not all low-E glass is created equal. Sputter-coated glass provides high visible-light transmission and optimal transparency, and it dramatically lowers heat gain or loss. Pyrolytic low-E coatings allow more solar heat to be transferred than sputter-coated glass. Unless the correct coated glass is installed, transparent glass that allows too much solar energy to penetrate the building can result in occupant discomfort, increased energy consumption and a costly strain on cooling systems.
If a higher solar-gain low-E coating is specified, the higher heat load from solar transmission can burden the cooling system. Energy costs rise more than they should because the air-conditioning system overworks to maintain a comfortable temperature throughout all sections of the building. In addition to controlling the solar heat gain inside a building, the correct glass can affect the size and efficiency of the HVAC equipment as well as daylighting systems. Minimizing solar heat gain through low-E coatings can actually reduce the size of an HVAC unit.
A recent study by engineering company Enermodal Engineering Inc. highlights these benefits. The study compared a new high-performance low-E coating to a standard commercial low-E coating that has been popular in recent years to see how much energy savings could be realized. A 175,000-square-foot, 10-story office building was simulated. The study found that the new glass has the potential to save $2.50 per square foot of glass by downsizing the chilled water and air distribution systems. In terms of operational cost savings, annual energy costs are lowered by as much as $1.60 per square foot of glass in a building with glare and daylighting controls.
In total, the new coating offered a 30 percent improvement in energy performance for a very small increase in glass cost. The return on investment would be realized in one to two years. The new coating offered a neutral appearance, glare control and a lower solar heat gain. But what is even more impressive is that the lower solar heat gain allowed for downsizing of the building’s HVAC system upfront in addition to ongoing energy savings.
There are more ways to creatively save energy than ever before. New glass coatings with improved energy savings and more natural light can compare favorably to older dark tints or reflective glass. If you have not looked recently for new options in glass, now is the time. With today’s choices, you are likely to find one that strikes the perfect balance for your project.