Industry leaders address the past, present and future of green building issues.
Native plants incorporated into vegetative strips around or within a parking lot can be beautiful and, when correctly applied to the civil design, reduce the stormwater runoff from the site. The use of rain gardens can bring a spot of visual interest into the landscape while purifying the stormwater before being discharged into the municipal system. Dedicated parcels of prairie within a site boundary can foster biodiversity in a location where it has been displaced and reduce the maintenance cost an owner pays for a traditional landscape. Using drought-tolerant native species in planting beds and open spaces brings four seasons of beauty into the landscape, while simultaneously reducing or eliminating the use of potable water for irrigation.
The concepts of using native plantings are simple, and the benefits are tangible. So why are so many people opposed to their use? One reason could be that native planting strategies are a visual break with tradition. A new ventilation strategy that improves indoor air quality while reducing energy consumption is not overtly visual. While this strategy may fit very well within a sustainable building, occupants of that building do not concern themselves with that system unless they are too cold or too warm. Conversely, when the landscape around a building incorporates a native planting strategy, a building occupant may have to explain to a friend or a spouse why the grounds around their building look, in their opinion, unkempt. As practitioners of sustainability, we must patiently continue to educate those around us in an effort to foster their understanding and hopefully expedite the eventual widespread adoption of these and other similarly misunderstood sustainable strategie