Environmental Design and Construction Magazine
  Home
  Advertising
  Subscribe to ED+C
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online Collections
  Enviro-Blog
  Digital Edition
  ED+C eNews
  Web Exclusive Editorial
  EDU+cast Webinars
  White Papers
  Case Studies
  Videos
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Products
  Resources
  ED+C Archives
  Sustainable Home Archives
  Career Center
  AEC Store, Books + Videos
  Calendar of Events
  Classifieds + Marketplace
  GREEN Book
  Industry Links
  Product Info (FREE)
  Radiant Flooring Guide
  Market Research
  Green Digital 09
  ED+C Information
  Special Sections
  Sustainable Home
  LEED Guide
  Cool Roofing
  Sustainable Flooring
  Concrete
  Indoor Air Quality/ GREENGUARD
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Enviro-Blog
The Future of Energy
by James D. Qualk LEED AP
March 1, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Buildings account for nearly 40 percent* of total U.S. energy consumption and 70 percent* of all electricity consumption. As a result, buildings contribute to 39 percent* of overall carbon emissions in the U.S. In fact, the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report cited that buildings provide the most significant opportunity for reducing carbon emissions.

Based on these numbers, they also play a significant role in the emerging energy questions of the near and long-term future of our economies and planet. Efficiency should always be the first consideration, and the development of renewable energy sources (i.e. wind, solar, tidal and micro-hydro) must be our next priority. These sources generate far less pollution and are perpetually regenerative.

Additionally, the uses of these sources on a distributed basis need to be explored. By generating electricity at the point of use, we eliminate the need for costly infrastructure while decreasing the amount of electricity that is lost during transmission. This strategy also minimizes the potential for blackouts due to natural disaster or other like events.

It’s still important to note that the playing field for these emerging technologies is not entirely level. Subsidies and tax breaks for older polluting fuels need to shift to renewable, distributed forms of generation.

People are ready to make a change, but in the current marketplace they don’t have access to the right choices. The recently signed stimulus package does include some relief to help get the renewable energy sector moving, but still doesn’t completely address the true opportunity that exists. Ultimately, significant changes must occur in coming years because our economy’s health and productivity depend on it.

 

* Various sources compiled by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC).



James D. Qualk LEED AP
James D. Qualk, LEED AP, is vice president of SSRCx, a wholly owned subsidiary of engineering design and facility consulting firm Smith Seckman Reid, Inc.

|PrintEmail
  Comments (3)Post a Comment
Title: How do you do it?


These are all good ideas on where we go. How do we get there? Tax breaks and stimulus are great, but what do you do with the money and how do you finance?
Futura Solar thinks that the roof has to be the array and the array has to be the roof. EE & RE have to be at the heart of the system because turning off the internal electric lights (during the day) and eliminating the associated heat load will provice the greatest savings, which in turn will finance the transition. Gathering the solar load in any usable form then becomes the RE portion of the system. Thermal numbers are better than PV and routinely deliverable.


Title: Solar PV back to the barn


The auto thrived in the early 1900's not because of subsidies but because it beat the alternatives far and away. PV at .20 to .40 kwh does not beat any of the alternatives except maybe a turbine with less than 30% efficiency.

We need to quit subsidizing a non sustainable technology and send it back to the lab till the installed costs can be driven down to be competitive. Meanwhile look very seriously at cleaning up the heavy lifters of coal, ngas, and nuclear.


Title: We need to level the playing field.


Currently, the coal, oil and gas industries enjoy the highest U.S. subsidies of our potential energy sources. These are already profitable businesses, in fact the most profitable in history, and therefore do not need federal assistance. Coincidentally, these industries have the highest potential for environmental destruction and adverse health effects. We can shift subsidies and taxes, revenue neutrally, today and level the playing field for renewable energy sources which do not harm the environment or adversely affect the health of the public. Technology will advance but making sure a marketplace for these sources of energy exists in the current “gamed” market is a priority. There is a great deal of detail about this strategy in Lester Brown's recent book Plan B 3.0.

Independently, the energy industry is focusing on getting us there now. For more about this effort, read the following article from www.energycentral.com:

http://www.energycentral.com/centers/energybiz/ebi_detail.cfm?id=647


 
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.


BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy