Environmental Design and Construction Magazine
  Home
  Advertising
  Subscribe to ED+C
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online Collections
  Enviro-Blog
  Digital Edition
  ED+C eNews
  Web Exclusive Editorial
  EDU+cast Webinars
  White Papers
  Case Studies
  Videos
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Products
  Resources
  ED+C Archives
  Sustainable Home Archives
  Career Center
  AEC Store, Books + Videos
  Calendar of Events
  Classifieds + Marketplace
  GREEN Book
  Industry Links
  Product Info (FREE)
  Radiant Flooring Guide
  Market Research
  Green Product Buzz Guide
  ED+C Information
  Special Sections
  Sustainable Home
  LEED Guide
  Cool Roofing
  Sustainable Flooring
  Concrete
  Indoor Air Quality/ GREENGUARD
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Web Exclusive: What can chickens teach us about cool roofing?

January 15, 2007

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

65% Energy Savings - ERSystems worked with North Carolina State University and Statesville Roofing to evaluate the effects of Cool Roofing on poultry production.


Background

High temperatures effect feed consumption, weight gain, feed efficiency, and mortality in the production of poultry. Therefore, during the summer months, the temperature in poultry houses is maintained at or below 85ºF. Summer energy usage can be the highest component of production costs incurred by poultry growers. The goal of this project was to reduce the interior temperature of one of two poultry houses and document it in a side by side comparison of the two houses in North Carolina. Highly reflective elastomeric coatings have been proven to reduce interior temperatures in metal buildings (see additional Project Profiles from ERSystems).


Project Description

Two 42 x 400 foot poultry houses (side by side) were used for the study. Each house has a 19,500 bird capacity. One house utilized ERSystems Cool Roofing Technology (highly reflective white coatings keep the roof surface temperature cooler) and the other house was maintained as a control. The birds were placed in each house on June 13, 2005 for the two month trial.


Results

Enlarge this picture
Table 1— Results of study
Table 1— Results of study
A table summarizing the results of the study is shown. Very large differences in the electrical use and the bird mortality were produced. The total energy saved was just under 65% and the mortality rate was reduced by 28%. The average daily temperature and the average weight of the birds did not show as significant differences. The bird mortality rate as well as energy savings are most likely related to daily high temperatures.


Enlarge this picture
Figure 1 - Internal House Temperatures
Figure 1 - Internal House Temperatures
The graph in Figure 1 shows the difference between the trial and control houses. Note that the daily high temperature difference is consistently greater than 4 degrees. This temperature difference occurs during the mid day and increases the electrical consumption and the peak electrical demand. It has been shown that even slight temperature reductions during peak periods can result in significant electrical savings both in peak demand and electrical usage.


Data Collection

  • Temperature loggers for in house ambient temperature - NCSU
  • Separate electrical meters on each house - Duke Power
  • Production records for weight at sale, feed efficiency, water consumption and mortality


ERSystems Products Utilized on Project

  • Eraguard 2000 Primer for Metal
  • Eraguard 1000 White Finish Coat - 84% Reflectivity
Roof Coating Installation Contractor: Statesville Roofing

For more information on ERSystems products and services please contact us at 800.403.7747 or www.ersystems.com.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy